本站提供正體中文版。切換到正體中文本站提供简体中文版。切换到简体中文このサイトには日本語版があります。日本語で表示이 사이트는 한국어로도 제공됩니다.한국어로 보기Diese Website ist auch auf Deutsch verfügbar.Auf Deutsch ansehenEste sitio web también está disponible en español.Ver en españolQuesto sito è disponibile anche in italiano.Visualizza in italianoCe site est également disponible en français.Afficher en françaisEste site também está disponível em português.Ver em portuguêsDeze website is ook beschikbaar in het Nederlands.In het Nederlands bekijkenЭтот сайт также доступен на русском языке.Смотреть на русскомयह वेबसाइट हिन्दी में भी उपलब्ध है।हिन्दी में देखेंهذا الموقع متاح أيضًا باللغة العربية.عرض بالعربيةSitus ini juga tersedia dalam bahasa Indonesia.Lihat dalam bahasa IndonesiaBu site Türkçe olarak da mevcut.Türkçe görüntüleTa strona jest dostępna także po polsku.Wyświetl po polskuTrang web này cũng có phiên bản tiếng Việt.Xem bằng tiếng Việtاین وب‌سایت به فارسی هم در دسترس است.مشاهده به فارسی

Why Do LLMs Hallucinate? A Student Who Can't Turn In a Blank Exam

AI2026.05

Why do LLMs hallucinate?

The way I see it, you can picture an LLM as a student like this: he’s read a great many books, but his memory has been compressed, and he himself doesn’t know which parts have actually grown fuzzy; worse still, he’s been required to—during the exam—“never turn in a blank sheet.”

An infographic that uses a student, adrift in a sea of books and required to “leave nothing blank and answer every question,” as a metaphor for why LLMs hallucinate, listing six causes such as compressed memory and mixed-up sources

Its Strength Isn’t “Knowing Whether It Knows”

This student’s real strength isn’t judging whether he “actually knows,” but stringing words together fluently so that the answer looks like a reasonable one.

So when the material itself is vague, the sources are muddled, or the very first step of reasoning goes wrong, what follows may—for the sake of keeping a consistent tone—grow ever more complete, and ever more confidently wrong.

The Key Is to Narrow Its Room to “Patch Things In Recklessly”

For this reason, when using AI, the point isn’t just to toss out a line like “find me the answer.” It’s to find ways to narrow its room to “patch things in recklessly.”

A better approach is to:

  • structure the question, spelling out the background, the constraints, and the output format;
  • when there’s too much material, feed it in batches so it can process step by step;
  • and, more importantly, provide correct sources and require it to “answer according to the sources,” flagging anywhere it’s unsure.

Treat It as an Assistant That Needs a Clear Assignment

To put it another way: treat AI as an assistant that “needs to be given a clear question, reference materials, and a defined scope for its answer.”

The looser the question, the more easily it patches things in; the more clearly you frame the scope, the more likely it is to genuinely help.

In other words, if the person asking can design the question to be more like a “fill-in-the-blank” than a boundless “essay question,” then the answers AI gives will usually be more convergent, and closer to a more precise result.