本站提供正體中文版。切換到正體中文本站提供简体中文版。切换到简体中文このサイトには日本語版があります。日本語で表示이 사이트는 한국어로도 제공됩니다.한국어로 보기Diese Website ist auch auf Deutsch verfügbar.Auf Deutsch ansehenEste sitio web también está disponible en español.Ver en españolQuesto sito è disponibile anche in italiano.Visualizza in italianoCe site est également disponible en français.Afficher en françaisEste site também está disponível em português.Ver em portuguêsDeze website is ook beschikbaar in het Nederlands.In het Nederlands bekijkenЭтот сайт также доступен на русском языке.Смотреть на русскомयह वेबसाइट हिन्दी में भी उपलब्ध है।हिन्दी में देखेंهذا الموقع متاح أيضًا باللغة العربية.عرض بالعربيةSitus ini juga tersedia dalam bahasa Indonesia.Lihat dalam bahasa IndonesiaBu site Türkçe olarak da mevcut.Türkçe görüntüleTa strona jest dostępna także po polsku.Wyświetl po polskuTrang web này cũng có phiên bản tiếng Việt.Xem bằng tiếng Việtاین وب‌سایت به فارسی هم در دسترس است.مشاهده به فارسی

FBPP: A Fast Preprocessing Script for Beginners

Preprocessing & Stacking2024.06

WBPP is comprehensive, but for beginners, that big pile of baffling options is often the first hurdle to getting into PixInsight. The FBPP (Fast Batch Preprocessing) introduced in PixInsight 1.8.9-3 is a script that removes that hurdle almost entirely.

What Is FBPP

FBPP was released alongside PixInsight 1.8.9-3 and can be seen as WBPP slimmed down once more — slimmed down until there’s almost nothing left to choose.

The FBPP script interface: almost no options to choose

Using it goes roughly like this:

  1. Load your lights, darks, flats, and bias (bias is optional), and choose whether it’s a color camera (CFA); if the exposure times of the lights and darks don’t match, you can specify them yourself. And that’s where the setup ends — all those options in WBPP that beginners can’t make sense of are gone.
  2. The integration algorithms are all set automatically too. The whole process just does calibration, debayering (for color cameras), basic measurement, registration, and fast integration.

If you’re a beginner encountering PixInsight for the first time and just want to stack, or an enthusiast doing Lucky Imaging with hundreds or thousands of frames on hand, FBPP is quite suitable, and you’ll hardly ever pick the wrong settings. As for veterans, you can keep using WBPP for the most complete and comprehensive flexibility in settings.

Just How Different Are FBPP and WBPP?

I ran an experiment myself, comparing the speed of FBPP and WBPP. The test was integrating 65 APS-C-sized (IMX571), 24-megapixel images, with the master calibration frames prepared in advance.

The FBPP vs. WBPP speed comparison experiment

The results were as follows:

  1. If WBPP uses Fast Integration, the final speed is exactly the same as FBPP (1:51).
  2. If WBPP uses Image Integration, then FBPP takes only about a third of WBPP’s time (FBPP 1:51 vs. WBPP 5:21).

In other words, FBPP’s “speed” mainly comes from its taking the Fast Integration route by default; the moment WBPP also switches to Fast Integration, the speeds even out.

Who should use which?

  • Beginners: FBPP is recommended — very fast, simple, and easy to use.
  • Non-beginners: WBPP is recommended — fast or slow, or going all out for the best result, it does it all.

(Test platform: AMD R9-7950X, Teamgroup DDR5 48GB×2, Windows 11 Enterprise 23H2, PixInsight 1.8.9-3 build 1612.)